I need a quicker drawing to kickstart me back to where I need to be. Not a sketch but a drawing. I will try to take a somewhat lax approach knowing that instinct will kick in and tighten things up.
To that end I have a photo I like of actress Sharon Mitchell, found online. I'll do two drawings, one a profile and the other a full torso image. First I zoomed the pic on my screen (10 x 17.5") and held a regular 8.5 x 11.5 sheet of typing paper to it to trace the images.
I then used a lightbox to retrace them onto pages from an art tablet, 8 x 10. None of these contour lines will make it into the actual drawing, they will all be erased and replaced with as few contours and as much shading as possible as I go. They are for placement alone.
The image was not a large file, so blowing it up to this size did not lend it clarity for detail. I will refer to other sources as needed. for example, I have a few old Avon catalogs - excellent for closeups of lip texture, eyes, etc. The jacket is black leather (yummy on women!), a texture I've never drawn before. I'm looking forward to seeing whether I can recreate the feel of it.
Not starting in this morning, already feel my eyes are a little strained staring at this computer screen too long. Need sleep first too.
*******
I don't want to comment on getting through New Year's Eve. God I fucking hate New Year's Eve.
Potential artist with one hell of an artistic block and trying to get back in the zone.
Monday, January 4, 2016
Friday, December 25, 2015
Chrstmas Evening
Christmas Day. Merry Christmas to you.
Wasn't feeling it this season.
Christmas seemed like an obligation to be observed, not a thing to be
celebrated. The scents, the tastes, the sights, the textures...that
tactile qualities were missing, the warm sensibilities, and so too
the spirit as well. I was happy with the way the tree turned out (the pic above doesn't capture the lights, at least 400 of them, red and white in equal measure),
and I watched a few movies with nostalgic ties to the season which
almost brought forward a sense of the holiday...but mostly it was a
non-starter.
Haven't been able to force myself draw.
Sketch, a little, but not draw. Depression has been manageable: present, binding, but it didn't
drag me back into the well. Day's not over yet, and there's still
New Year's Eve and January to go. My birthday.
I'm hoping to get hold of an external
hard drive, as a few people have said they might hook me up with one.
I don't know how that works, whether it will allow me to play DVDs
on my comp and get screen caps again. Screen caps are pending for
Pretty in Pink (bought a copy), Some Kind of Wonderful, and Weird
Science as I want to sketch or draw her appearances in them..
I'll get right to it – I didn't hear
from her. 2015 was my last shot, I got Dana's attention at the beginning of the year and the opportunity to finally be heard, now the year draws to a close and nothing has come of it. I dunno, maybe she has the same block that keeps her from
reaching out, maybe she's depressed...yeah, and maybe I'm making the
same damn excuses for her. Part of me wants to rail at her, to hope
something sinks in and hurts her feelings – I need very badly to
know whether she is capable of feeling anything. Thing is...if she's
looking in to read it, then the chances are she doesn't deserve to be
blamed. OTOH, if she really is that cold then it wouldn't register
with her anyway – she doesn't give a fuck if she's hurt someone.
Venting to release my grief is a bandage on a gut wound. I still
need to, it just won't help. Nothing ever changes.
Drawing upon my own experience, the
depression that kept me from writing to her for three years following
high school...because I could see not see myself clearly enough to
understand the problem, I could not explain it to anyone else.
Certainly not to her. That added to the restriction, because how
would she ever comprehend my avoidance of her? I was sure she
wouldn't forgive me. She did, once it lifted, but I had realized
that not only was I free to write to her but that what mattered more
was that I make the effort for my own sake. Either she would
understand or not, at least I finally did myself. It would be out
there and no longer on me but up to her whether to respond.
From that, I would want her to know
that I am not sitting here with a million questions she's required to
answer. I just want to hear her tell me that she still thinks of me
as a friend. As much as I want to know her story, as much of it as
she can tell me, it matters only to have her friendship back. It
means more to me that she might want to share her story with
me than that I have explanations. Justifications aren't important.
She is.
I would also have her know that if she
thinks she's doing me any favors by keeping her silence, she couldn't
be more wrong. I meant what I said before, that she has nothing to
apologize for over what occurred between us. It's what she chooses
now that matters...if she remains silent of her own volition now,
it's the one thing I will never forgive her for.
Friday, November 27, 2015
Some Kind of Not so Wonderful
Made it through Thanksgiving okay, no
lows. Mostly on autopilot. Not doing so well today, slow crash. Others are
suffering fresh losses this holiday season. Trying to make myself
work but heart isn't in it. Just a sketch or two, anything. Force
myself. Won't be my bess, nothing inspires, but anything.
(a week ago, Thursday)
It's not difficult to do the work once
it's flowing, but it's getting harder to make myself sit and begin.
Tonight would be a prime example. It's half past midnight, it's
raining...I ought to go for a walk. Nowhere to go, nothing is open.
Honestly, mood I'm in I'd like to not come back. But since I'm not
going to walk...b'oof. I'd rather just sit here and type out what
I'm feeling. Well, hell, I'll hold that at bay. Dana used to
call my letters books, and to me they were still short. She guessed
that I was holding something back, which I was and thought it
uncannily observant pf her...but I had no idea at the time that she
had guessed wrong about just what it was I wasn't saying. What I'd
just been through, mostly. And that I was in love with her. In
hindsight, I realize she was expecting it was something very
different but I had no way of knowing that when I was writing her.
I did that, though – copiously
spilled my heart onto the net, I mean. I've had two prior blogs,
both long gone now, into which I tried to work out my lows. One was
anonymous, using no real names (not even my own) so that I was free
to be open. A few people read it, no one who had ever met me
personally. One person expressed astonishment...I'm not sure if he
thought I was brave to be so candid or just reckless. The other blog
I put my name to as I hoped someone would someday plug my name into a
search engine and find me there...but that meant I had to rein in
what I could say. It would help to relieve my heart in the short
run, one post at a time, but it never helped me any in the long term.
I wonder, when abstract artists express
intangibles like love and pain in a work, does that help them
through it? I wonder. Maybe it doesn't matter that I don't do
expressive work, maybe I wouldn't find respite there anyway. What
about photographers, does their work serve to soothe their broken
hearts?Sorry, I've got nothing right now per art or blocks other than
“hard to overcome”. Not exactly news. I'm trying to make myself
get to some work tonight. I should have stuck with acting.
I'm proud of Dana. I'm pretty sure
she'd be baffled as to why, were she to ever learn that. And ya know
what? She never will know, ever, because she hasn't the courage to
ask. In many ways she's a strong woman, and I look up to her for
it...but she's not strong in all ways. Facing the people who care
about her is not among her strengths. Telling them that their
concern for her, their love and hopes for her, their determination to
stand by her side means anything to her...if any of this is anything
she values, she keeps it to herself. I wish she would tell me, one
way or the other. The not knowing is the thing that does all the
damage. I'm afraid she's okay with that.
I have heard that she has a rep for
being protective toward those around her. She is admired for it by
those she allows into her life, and by me on the outside of it. It's
one of the things I'm proud of her for. It's something I hold onto
when depression sinks in and I wonder whether she has any feelings
left at all for anyone. That's where I am right now. Anyone who
acts on a protective instinct can't be completely unfeeling. Can
they?
There was a lesson I learned once, with
the second girl I ever fell in love with. The first, Kristina, I
always knew I would never hook up with, but Diane...she was the first
person who ever spoke to me as if it mattered to her that I was the
one listening. She disappeared from my life without ever knowing
that she mattered to me. That jaw-dropping moment when I suddenly
realized I was in love with her, and determined to tell her...I
wasn't aware that I had already seen her for the last time hours
earlier. If someone means something to you, don't let the chance to
tell them slip through your fingers.
Sunday, November 22, 2015
(suddenly wound)
Huh. Okay. Wow.
I haven't had that happen in a long time. I was just watching Pretty in Pink, kinda half-watching, and I think I just saw Dana as an extra.
Then again, I was called for jury duty last year and there was a woman in the reserves room who looked like her too. Many years ago, I kept seeing her everywhere.
You've always been beautiful, Dana.
I haven't had that happen in a long time. I was just watching Pretty in Pink, kinda half-watching, and I think I just saw Dana as an extra.
Then again, I was called for jury duty last year and there was a woman in the reserves room who looked like her too. Many years ago, I kept seeing her everywhere.
You've always been beautiful, Dana.
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Still
On one occasion in first grade we were
instructed to write a short paragraph that began with the premise
that we were ideating on our porches. The we were to commandeer the
crayons and draw what we had written. When we were done, people
marveled over my drawing for the usual reason – they thought I
could draw well. There was another marvel for them in my work, which
I have always felt mortified by, and that's my singular lack of
imagination. Oh, they didn't see it that way, but...well, how
could anyone not? They drew their dreams. I had drawn
myself sitting on a porch thinking. That's some bloody
literal-mindedness for ya right there.
I was told once by a teacher at
Franklin that I fall naturally into the category of illustrator. I
don't know how I feel about that, as I know intellectually it's not a
bad thing. Most of the works that have spoken to me have been the
work of illustrators whose voices I aspired to. Still, the comment
brought up that shame over the grade-school assignment: I wish I was
more creative, more imaginative.
When I read books, sometimes I try to
keep that illustrator comment in mind. Does anything stand out as
something I would draw were I to land that gig? I think I'm taking
the wrong approach, as an illustration does not necessarily mean
scenery. I could easily do objects, characters...but I always think
scenery.
Actually, what I think is turning a
book into a movie – literal scenery. I've been seeing them that
way since high school...I edit them in my mind, direct the
performances, decide which dialog to cut or change, what to do with
the staging and cameras, the lighting, the score and sound
terrain...I've been reading A Wrinkle in Time one chapter every few
days to linger over it. In this book, characters “tesser”, that
is they travel via tesseract. When I read Madeleine L'Engle's
description of the first leg of the journey, I knew just how to
direct that sequence to convey the physical experience of it to my
audience. Shame I'm an not a director with the backing and standing
to actually do it, that movie will remain locked in my head forever.
No one will see it. Not that I've figured out how to convincingly
put the major character of Charles Wallace on film...
But that gets to one of my major
frustrations. I don't visualize in images, I see in movement.
If I could animate with the same full detail and shading with which
I do a single drawing, that's what I'd be doing. .Oh, how I
would love to make my drawings come alive! I love drawing women, but
if I could do a portrait with eyes that blink, or hair that subtly
shifts – or wildly dances! A portrait where, if you look closely,
you can see her breathing.
Where is the magic of Harry Potter when
I need it?
Years ago I was entranced by Nadja
Salerno-Sonenberg. She was regarded by her peers (the stuffy world
of classical music) with some consternation and dismay, and I've
heard some scorn, because she was not content to remain staid by
her art. When NS-S played, she played to feel. She stomped
and swayed, grimaced and wept, she let the music move her and those
raw emotions were naked on her face. For the audience, that's
powerful to behold. It's entrancing, exhilarating. She was often
likened to a rock star of the orchestra.
I've always wanted to draw her playing,
except...no single image does justice her raptures. It would take a
whole series to convey just one brief moment of one of her
performances. Her face...that's what entrances me most. She's like
a woman having sex when she plays. It's astonishingly beautiful to
behold her visceral responses set free, fully felt.
That's what I see when you lay out a
blank sheet before me. I see a sequence of beauty that I cannot
reduce to a still image.
************************
Jesseca has pointed me to a light-table
that is easily accessible and large enough not to risk folding a
page over its edges. It's my front window. As long as I remove the
tape that held it up slowly, and not let the tape eat the paper, it
works great! So, I'm taking my commissioned piece back to the point
of a completed trace. That's not a real setback, and it gets me a
clean drawing I can really be happy with.
This doesn't the need for doing grids, I still need that process for enlarging, but it does mean the final piece will be free of lines I couldn't entirely erase. As much as I like the idea of letting some of the work show, I'm not at all happy charging money for a drawing that has visible gridlines.
About tracing...I used to think that in order for a piece to be "honest", it had to be entirely by eye. Tracing was a cheat, I thought. That led to any number of attempts abandined because something didn't line up as I needed it to, some detail out of proportion, etc. Still, the mistaken prejudice persisted and that added to to the block that was building.
That's a hangup and a misconception others aspiring artists may hold, so I want to say clearly to you: "it's bullshit". Plenty of artists do this. For my own particular work, trace lines are just placeholders anyway, to make sure everything is where it should be. They get erased as I get around to each detail, and replaced with more nuanced shading. I'm alwasy happiest with a detail when I can convey oit through tonal field with no contour line remaining at all. But saying that sounds like I;m trying to excuse the use of contour lines...and that re-enforces the misconception. Your own art, your style or voice, may well incorporate contour lines. There's nothing wrong with tracing! What matter is what you do with it from that point.
Let me be clear, though, doing the work by eye is indispensible when you're still learning - and you should always be "still learning", if that process ever ends you might as well retire. The point is to train your mind to process the visual information, to learn how to translate what you're seeing to the page. However, once you reach a certain point it's okay to take shortcuts. You''ll know where the real work is. I can't map out every thread of Jesseca's hat, but I can make it look like I did. Place the drawing over the photo and you'll see discrepancies. What matters is getting the feel of it right, and conveying the essence.
You do what the image demands. Nothing is a cheat if it gets you there.
Thursday, October 29, 2015
Filling in the Blanks
That's pretty much how I feel. You can't post without a title, and I don't have one.
So. It's the end of October, I'm well into my current project (per this blog) and am trying to get myself back into the frame of mind to write up movies (per the other).
I cannot show you the progress I've made on my current drawing because it's a commission, and thus private. Perhaps when I'm finished my client will grant me permission to do so. I will need to find a resource that can scan images of that size. What I can show you is a selection of it that will demonstrate part of the process that went into its preparation.
See, I'm working on an a tablet that's 18x24". A tablet that size is a little unwieldy for my current messy work environment. One obstacle has been transferring the image with its increase in size. Umm - this might be a repetition of information I've posted earlier, so bear with me.
First, my client wishes a drawing based off a photograph, which I have a hard print of and a scan of for my screen. He is wearing a hat, which he wishes removed. He has another photograph of a different size, resolution, etc., in which he is not wearing a hat. It's close enough: with one of those graphics programs I'm not a whiz at, I was able to isolate the top of his head (!), flip it, resize it, re-orient it, paste it, and make it a semi-transparent blend. After that it went up on my 1600x900 screen and I copied it onto tracing paper. With one of those lightboxe devices I traced it again onto a 9x12 page.
Here's the tricky part, and time-consuming. As I have no overhead projector, I was forced to upscale the image using The Grid Method. Do artists call it The Grid Method? I have no idea. Fuck it, I'm going to. The Grid Method is something I read about as a child but have never used before, and sounds simple. Basically, you map out a grid over the desired image with a ruler, then create a similar but larger-scaled grid on the surface you'll be using for the actual piece. Below is the donor grid over the initial tracing:
Each square is a quarter of an inch, IRL. I doubled that for the actual drawing. Like I said, the above image is only a portion of the actual picture, it's been enlarged and had the contrast significantly increased. Notice the lines are a little sloppy...that's not a problem, it's what's inside them that counts. The bigger hurdle is erasing them once you're done with them. I'm needing to get a sturdier eraser, if you look closely enough at the peper the final drawing is on you can still make them out. Stand away from it and they disappear, but I'm not happy with it yet. Then again, I'm not done yet. It will take practice and experimentin with other leads before I can draw a grid softly with ease.
Keeping track of the info from square to square also takes concentration. It's not as easy as it looks if you've mapped out an extensive area. All of the above process took some eight hours to complete, bringing me to the point where I could start in on actually drawing instead of prepping.
As I related in the last post, my drawing of Jesseca almost threw me when it came to capturing her facial expression - those changes in shading. I believe what gave me trouble was the difference in luminosity between the screen and the hardcopy, but even so the wary thought lingered that I was out of practice. That has yet to pay into my current work - we'll see. There are choices to be made in tones that I haven't gotten to yet.
****************
My friend Scott may have one or two commissions. One is a photo in his possession, and another is one he wants to arrange. Both are family portraits. I'm looking forward to them once the current one is completed.
Facebook is, I suppose, a necessary evil for getting me work. Also, Jesseca shares fun stuff with me, as well as social content worth forwarding. Otherwise I try to stay off of it. I had hoped FB would help me reconnect with Dana, and instead it's turned out to be one more chance to get burned by her. By this point she's read what I was trying to reach her with, and I have to conclude it didn't make a difference. She might have said "please wait" or "I'm not ready to talk to you" or even 'I don't know if I can do this". But she has said nothing and that speaks so much louder. More blanks to fill in: what do I trust, the real-life evidence or my fading hopes, promising dreams that are months old and unrepeated?
The holiday season has begun. Days in which I must fend off lows are increasing in number but not severity. I'm getting by. I have to steel myself now, though, against the certainty that it will have been another year I didn't hear from her..
****************
When I make a library run I always stop at Goodwill to look for DVDs, music, and books. Today I picked up Madeleine L'Engle's "A Wrinkle in Time". I read that and "A Wind in the Door" back when I was in grade school, and was taken with the soulful fantasy of them. Now I see there's a quintet of books. I'm hoping to rediscover some of that again, perhaps find some inspiration in it (or them, with luck).
So. It's the end of October, I'm well into my current project (per this blog) and am trying to get myself back into the frame of mind to write up movies (per the other).
I cannot show you the progress I've made on my current drawing because it's a commission, and thus private. Perhaps when I'm finished my client will grant me permission to do so. I will need to find a resource that can scan images of that size. What I can show you is a selection of it that will demonstrate part of the process that went into its preparation.
See, I'm working on an a tablet that's 18x24". A tablet that size is a little unwieldy for my current messy work environment. One obstacle has been transferring the image with its increase in size. Umm - this might be a repetition of information I've posted earlier, so bear with me.
First, my client wishes a drawing based off a photograph, which I have a hard print of and a scan of for my screen. He is wearing a hat, which he wishes removed. He has another photograph of a different size, resolution, etc., in which he is not wearing a hat. It's close enough: with one of those graphics programs I'm not a whiz at, I was able to isolate the top of his head (!), flip it, resize it, re-orient it, paste it, and make it a semi-transparent blend. After that it went up on my 1600x900 screen and I copied it onto tracing paper. With one of those lightboxe devices I traced it again onto a 9x12 page.
Here's the tricky part, and time-consuming. As I have no overhead projector, I was forced to upscale the image using The Grid Method. Do artists call it The Grid Method? I have no idea. Fuck it, I'm going to. The Grid Method is something I read about as a child but have never used before, and sounds simple. Basically, you map out a grid over the desired image with a ruler, then create a similar but larger-scaled grid on the surface you'll be using for the actual piece. Below is the donor grid over the initial tracing:
Each square is a quarter of an inch, IRL. I doubled that for the actual drawing. Like I said, the above image is only a portion of the actual picture, it's been enlarged and had the contrast significantly increased. Notice the lines are a little sloppy...that's not a problem, it's what's inside them that counts. The bigger hurdle is erasing them once you're done with them. I'm needing to get a sturdier eraser, if you look closely enough at the peper the final drawing is on you can still make them out. Stand away from it and they disappear, but I'm not happy with it yet. Then again, I'm not done yet. It will take practice and experimentin with other leads before I can draw a grid softly with ease.
Keeping track of the info from square to square also takes concentration. It's not as easy as it looks if you've mapped out an extensive area. All of the above process took some eight hours to complete, bringing me to the point where I could start in on actually drawing instead of prepping.
As I related in the last post, my drawing of Jesseca almost threw me when it came to capturing her facial expression - those changes in shading. I believe what gave me trouble was the difference in luminosity between the screen and the hardcopy, but even so the wary thought lingered that I was out of practice. That has yet to pay into my current work - we'll see. There are choices to be made in tones that I haven't gotten to yet.
****************
My friend Scott may have one or two commissions. One is a photo in his possession, and another is one he wants to arrange. Both are family portraits. I'm looking forward to them once the current one is completed.
Facebook is, I suppose, a necessary evil for getting me work. Also, Jesseca shares fun stuff with me, as well as social content worth forwarding. Otherwise I try to stay off of it. I had hoped FB would help me reconnect with Dana, and instead it's turned out to be one more chance to get burned by her. By this point she's read what I was trying to reach her with, and I have to conclude it didn't make a difference. She might have said "please wait" or "I'm not ready to talk to you" or even 'I don't know if I can do this". But she has said nothing and that speaks so much louder. More blanks to fill in: what do I trust, the real-life evidence or my fading hopes, promising dreams that are months old and unrepeated?
The holiday season has begun. Days in which I must fend off lows are increasing in number but not severity. I'm getting by. I have to steel myself now, though, against the certainty that it will have been another year I didn't hear from her..
****************
When I make a library run I always stop at Goodwill to look for DVDs, music, and books. Today I picked up Madeleine L'Engle's "A Wrinkle in Time". I read that and "A Wind in the Door" back when I was in grade school, and was taken with the soulful fantasy of them. Now I see there's a quintet of books. I'm hoping to rediscover some of that again, perhaps find some inspiration in it (or them, with luck).
Monday, September 21, 2015
Jesseca Trainham
I met Jesseca Trainham during the
Silver Age. We were both into Dario Argento and had registered as
members of the Dark Discussions cinema forums. Her nom-de-post was
Stay Hungry and she had some amazing, wild critiques to offer on
Suspiria and Argento's Phantom of the Opera.
The single happiest time in my life was
the week I spent in rural New York with Jesseca. I arrived with an
ear that refused to op from the flight, a knee scraped from a spill
the day before, and a finger recovering from infection. It didn't
matter, because I was in a state of grace. She met me at the airport
looking like a folk-rock star wearing a smile as wide as her
outstretched arms.
I've never known a soul more
compassionate than Jesseca, more insightful, or as voracious with
curiosity. She is a seeker of knowledge who goes right to the
source, never complacent to be a blind complacent follower of
teachings diluted and warped by orthodoxy. Her path is a wandering
one that embodies that most essential but rarely enacted endeavor of
human existence: she questions. 'Quest,' after all is, the root of
'question'.
Jesseca has been many things for me
including my confidant, and we have seen each other through any
number of personal crises. I'm damn lucky to have her in my life.
*
This drawing has been the most
challenging that I've completed so far, and it taught me at least one
valuable lesson and probably more. It was done on a Strathmore
drawing tablet, medium surface, 8x10 inches, using my usual 0.3 mm
mechanical pencil. The page has a nice cream tinge to it compared
the the bleached white of some papers, though the medium surface did
not afford me the smoother shading I'm capable of.
There is a quality to her expression
that I didn't manage to capture entirely from the photograph, and
I've not been able to pin down just where I went astray. You can see
her intelligence, her humor, and her warmth, those come through, but
there's also a joy that almost looks surprised radiating from her
smile, the spark in her eyes. I think it's a matter of the job I did
in shading her skin, but I'm not certain. I thought that was going
to be the easiest element but it surprised me in being the most
difficult. You see, I had to do some juggling with the tones that
altered them for the blank page. In a photograph, you have skin
tones that stand apart from a fully active background that are often
darker than the subject. If you are only drawing the subject, then
you have to make your skin tones darker than they are in the
photograph to bring them to life against a blank white field. Her
skin in the drawing is now darker then the reds in the plaid of her
hat, where in the photograph they are significantly darker than her
skin. You cannot stay a hundred percent true to the source, you have
to make choices.
This is where the invaluable lesson
came in. last Monday night I thought I was done with the drawing
(that last session was much shorter than expected, only two hours)
thus I made a scan. That done I compared the scan to the photograph
on my computer screen and found I had done too simplistic a job
rendering the tones of her face and throat. I then spent the next
four hours repeating a cycle of correcting, scanning, and comparing.
Now...scanning for details and comparisons to the source can be a
useful tool just as spraying a model or sculpt with primer can reveal
flaws in your work that need rectifying, but it can also be a trap.
The more I corrected (I scanned her about eight time that night) the
unhappier I became with the drawing. After awhile it was becoming
muddy in my eyes the way overworked colors in a painting become
muddy. Here's the thing: I was trying to get a scan that
looked right. My estimation of work needed was based not on the
drawing as it lay on the page but based on what the scanner saw and
relayed to my screen. The scan is not the
drawing. If the lesson needs stating plainly, here it is –
let the drawing itself, and only the drawing, dictate what it
requires. I had to force myself to stop, but after two or three days
I was really happy with the results.
As I said, I had expected different
aspects of this to be the more difficult than actually transpired.
One thing that pleases me no end is that I can magnify the image many
times over and the fine details still look good. The earrings I had
to leave at 'good enough” rather than perfect, but that's a lesson
I've already learned (learning is one thing, becoming comfortable
with it another). The links of the necklace are almost
impressionistic rather than detailed, but thy look right all the
same. The butterfly pendant was surprisingly quick to manifest, and
reasonably accurate. I like how her hair came about. That wonderful
plaid hat of hers, now, that took forever! I had to map it out panel
by panel, many times erasing entirely what I had done and starting
over. This kind of detail is where it helps to have a large,
detailed image on your computer to check your work by. Not only can
you zoom in, the image onscreen is more luminous than a printed
photographed. The work paid off as the final result is the kind of tactile quality I strive for in every drawing. Looking at it, I can feel how warn, thick, and fuzzy the real thing must be. Her skin is soft and smooth, the glasses frames are study and clean, her hair full-bodied.
I'm often uncertain where to lay the border of the subject, under the throat. I had intended to establish the necklace itself as the lower border for this image, but once I began shading her throat the drawing insisted that I continue toward her shoulder. That was the right call to make.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)